Skip to content

Tech and games

Home » Blog » Disputed landmark AI rules face crunch EU talks

Disputed landmark AI rules face crunch EU talks


Regulations for Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The European Union’s aspirations to pioneer landmark regulations for artificial intelligence (AI) face a critical juncture as member states and lawmakers convene on Wednesday to negotiate a consensus on biometric surveillance and the regulation of systems like ChatGPT. This crucial meeting will determine the fate of the EU’s groundbreaking AI Act, proposed by the European Commission two years ago, potentially setting a precedent for countries worldwide searching for an alternative to the United States’ lax regulatory approach and China’s interim rules.

If a consensus is reached, the EU’s AI Act would become the first-of-its-kind regulation, shaping the framework for responsible AI development, deployment, and usage. It aims to strike a balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding fundamental rights, particularly in the realm of biometric surveillance and the use of advanced AI systems like ChatGPT.

The proposed regulations are a response to the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, where concerns about privacy, ethical use, and potential misuse have become increasingly prominent. The EU’s approach seeks to provide a robust legal framework that not only encourages innovation in AI but also establishes clear boundaries and safeguards against potential risks.

Biometric Surveillance

One of the key focal points of the negotiations is biometric surveillance, an area where technological advancements have raised considerable ethical and privacy concerns. Striking the right balance between utilizing biometric data for security purposes and safeguarding individual liberties will be a pivotal challenge.

Similarly, the regulation of AI systems, such as ChatGPT, is a central concern. These systems, powered by advanced machine learning models, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and generation. However, concerns about their potential to spread misinformation, invade privacy, or perpetuate biases need to be addressed.

Ai content

EU’s AI Act Aims

The EU’s AI Act aims to set standards that ensure transparency, accountability, and human oversight in the deployment of AI technologies. It also seeks to establish a risk-based approach, categorizing AI applications into high, low, and minimal risk, with more stringent requirements for high-risk applications.

As the negotiations unfold, the outcome will not only shape the future of AI regulations in the European Union but may also influence global approaches to AI governance. The EU’s emphasis on ethical AI, privacy protection, and a comprehensive regulatory framework could offer a model for other nations grappling with the challenges posed by rapidly advancing artificial intelligence technologies.

In a landscape where AI continues to evolve, finding common ground on regulations is essential to fostering trust among citizens, businesses, and governments. As the EU navigates this critical juncture, the world watches to see whether these landmark regulations will indeed position the European Union as a leader in shaping the responsible and ethical use of artificial intelligence.

AI Act Faces Backlash

Negotiations between European Union (EU) members and lawmakers are set to commence at 1400 GMT, with expectations that discussions may extend into the early hours of Thursday. Five individuals intimately involved in the talks have indicated that the probable outcome is a provisional agreement focusing on overarching principles rather than delving into critical details.

If an agreement is not reached, the AI Act faces the possibility of being set aside due to time constraints, thereby causing the 27-member bloc to forfeit its pioneering position in regulating this transformative technology. Alexandra van Huffelen, the Dutch minister for digitalization, emphasized the urgency of reaching a compromise, particularly regarding generative AI, by the conclusion of the year. She highlighted the global significance of the EU’s decision, stating, “The world is watching us: citizens, stakeholders, NGOs, and the private sector want us to agree on a meaningful piece of legislation regarding AI, including GPAI,” which refers to general-purpose AI systems with a diverse array of applications. The pressure to find common ground on this critical issue is underscored by the expectations and scrutiny of various stakeholders across the spectrum.


The proposed AI regulations are caught in the crossfire of conflicting demands within the EU, with two primary issues taking center stage: the role of AI in biometric surveillance and the regulation of foundation models, particularly generative AI such as Microsoft-backed OpenAI, which undergoes training on extensive datasets for diverse tasks.

A significant point of contention arises from EU lawmakers pushing for a complete ban on AI use in biometric surveillance, while member state governments advocate for exceptions in cases of national security, defense, and military applications.

Adding a layer of uncertainty, a late proposal by France, Germany, and Italy suggests allowing makers of generative AI models to engage in self-regulation, further complicating the negotiation landscape.

Despite separate preparatory meetings held last week by EU ambassadors and lawmakers, significant differences persist, making it challenging to reach a consensus, as disclosed by individuals involved in the talks who requested anonymity due to confidentiality.

An official from a major EU country emphasized that regardless of the meeting’s outcome, there is still substantial work ahead to address the complexities of AI regulation, reflecting the intricate nature of the issues under discussion. The divergent views among EU member states on the applications of AI, particularly in sensitive areas like surveillance and generative AI, pose substantial challenges to achieving a unified regulatory framework.

About Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *